Euclid and other geometers formalized the process of building a geometrical
construction, adopting specific tools.
In particular, there had been a debate among geometers about which were
the minimal required tools needed to draw given set of figures:
compass and ruler, only a ruler, only a compass and so on.
The Compass-and-ruler geometry is that field of the classical
geometry that requires the use of only a compass and a ruler,
and thus allows to construct those geometrical objects
that Galois proved to be those and only those that can be expressed in
term of algebraic equations that can be solved by applying a finite number of
rational operations or second order radicals.
The ruler allows to draw the segment that joins two given points or
the line passing through two different points; the compass allows to describe
a circumference or an arc with given center and radius.
Therefore now we know that not all constructions can be solved by using only
compass and ruler. For instance the famous problem of trisecting an angle
or finding the square of double area of a given square are not solvable
by construction with those tools.
A problem is defined as elementary solvable when it's possible to
solve it using compass and ruler only, and it's defined not
elementary solvable if the solution required other tools.
Even so, the compass-and-ruler paradigm is a very important
field of modern geometry, and it's useful in the educational area.